Evidencia de la validez concurrente del DSM-5 e ICD-11 en argentinos que buscan tratamiento por trastorno por uso de alcohol
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53732/rccsalud/2024.e6132Palabras clave:
trastornos relacionados con alcohol, manual diagnóstico y estadístico de los trastornos mentales, clasificación internacional de enfermedades, distrés psicológicoResumen
Los esfuerzos por comprender mejor el trastorno por uso de alcohol (TUA) han dado lugar a revisiones de los sistemas de clasificación más utilizados, el DSM y la ICD. Hay escasa información sobre cómo sus últimas versiones (DSM-5 y ICD-11) se relacionan con las características funcionales (deterioro funcional (DF) y angustia subjetiva (AS)) asociadas con el TUA. Objetivo: examinar cómo los criterios de los sistemas de diagnóstico se relacionaron con dos características funcionales (DF y AS) como evidencia de la validez concurrente en argentinos con TUA. Métodos: Realizamos un estudio correlacional-transversal con una muestra clínica (n = 34) en el año 2018. Resultados: La gravedad del AUD estuvo más fuertemente relacionada con la AS que con la DF. El DF se relacionó débilmente con el criterio mucho tiempo dedicado al uso. Se encontraron asociaciones débiles entre AS y deterioro de roles, problemas interpersonales, tolerancia y problemas físicos o psicológicos debido al uso, abstinencia y mucho tiempo dedicado al uso. Sólo una de las guías de la CIE estaba débilmente relacionada con la AS, y encontramos correlaciones positivas moderadas entre el DSM-5 y AS y entre el DSM-5 y DF. Conclusión: El DSM-5 fue más preciso que la CIE-11 para identificar a aquellos con mayores niveles de AS y DF y, por tanto, tuvo una mayor validez concurrente en la población observada. Estos resultados contribuyen a una mejor comprensión de la detección de las condiciones mentales relacionadas con el uso de alcohol.
Citas
World Health Organization. Global status report on alcohol and health 2018. World Health Organization. 2019. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565639
Rehm J, Manthey J, Struzzo P, Gual A, Wojnar M. Who receives treatment for alcohol use disorders in the European Union? A cross-sectional representative study in primary and specialized health care. Eur Psychiatry. 2015;30(8):885-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.07.012
Conde K, Salomón T, Civetta E, Blanco M, Cremonte M. Time to get help? Help-seeking process in Latin American hospital patients with alcohol use disorder. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020;18(2):328-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00157-3
Kelly JF, Greene MC, Bergman BG, White WL, Hoeppner BB. How many recovery attempts does it take to successfully resolve an alcohol or drug problem? Estimates and correlates from a national study of recovering US adults. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019;43(7):1533-1544. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31090945/
Saunders JB, Degenhardt L, Reed GM, Poznyak V. Alcohol use disorders in ICD‐11: Past, present, and future. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019;43(8):1617-1631. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31194891/
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
World Health Organization. International classification of diseases, 11th revision (ICD-11). ICD-11 is here. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. https://icd.who.int/en
Mannes ZL, Shmulewitz D, Livne O, Stohl M, Hasin DS. Correlates of mild, moderate, and severe Alcohol Use Disorder among adults with problem substance use: Validity implications for DSM‐5. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021;45(10):2118-2129. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34581461/
Balhara YP, Singh S, Modak T, Sarkar S. A cross-sectional study to assess disability and its correlates among treatment-seeking individuals with alcohol use disorders. Indian J Psychol Med. 2017;39(1):40-45. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28250557/
Verplaetse TL, Peltier MR, Roberts W, Pittman B, McKee SA. Gender and past year serious psychological distress are associated with past year AUD: time-varying results from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH; 2008–2017). Addict Behav. 2021;116:106815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106815
World Health Organization. Measuring health and disability: Manual for WHO disability assessment schedule WHODAS 2.0. World Health Organization; 2010. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/measuring-health-and-disability-manual-for-who-disability-assessment-schedule-(-whodas-2.0)
Aranguren M. Adaptación argentina de la escala de malestar psicológico de Kessler K10. PSICO. 2010;28(2):308-340. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201002.005
Piumatti G, Lietz F, Aresi G, Bjegovic-Mikanovic V. Alcohol use, psychological distress, and subjective well-being among young adult university students: A cross-national study between Serbia and Italy. J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2019;18(4):511-529. https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29308994
Sampasa-Kanyinga H, Zamorski MA, Colman I. Mental disorder, psychological distress, and functional status in Canadian military personnel. Can J Psychiatry. 2018;63(9):620-628. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29490473/
Boness CL, Lane SP, Sher KJ. Not all alcohol use disorder criteria are equally severe: Toward severity grading of individual criteria in college drinkers. Psychol Addict Behav. 2019;33(1):35-49. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000443
Kessler RC, Üstün TB. The World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004;13(2):93-121. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15297906/
Silveira C, Souza RT, Costa ML, Parpinelli MA, Pacagnella RC, Ferreira EC, et al. Validation of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) 12‐item tool against the 36‐item version for measuring functioning and disability associated with pregnancy and history of severe maternal morbidity. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;141 (Suppl 1):39-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12465
Subramaniam M, Abdin E, Vaingankar JA, Sagayadevan V, Shahwan S, Picco L, et al. Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 among older adults in an Asian country. Singapore Med J. 2019;61(5):246-253. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31197373/
Hajebi A, Motevalian A, Amin‐Esmaeili M, Rahimi‐Movaghar A, Sharifi V, Hoseini L, et al. Adaptation and validation of short scales for the assessment of psychological distress in Iran: The Persian K10 and K6. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018;27(3):e1726. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29888523/
Thelin C, Mikkelsen B, Laier G, Turgut L, Henriksen B, Olsen LR, et al. Danish translation and validation of Kessler's 10-item psychological distress scale–K10. Nord J Psychiatry. 2017;71(6):411-416. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28417648/
Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(6):710-718. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwk052
Brumback T, Cao D, McNamara P, King A. Alcohol-induced performance impairment: A 5-year re-examination study in heavy and light drinkers. Psychopharmacology. 2017;234(11):1749-1759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4577-x
Franco S, Olfson M, Wall MM, Wang S, Hoertel N, Blanco C. Shared and specific associations of substance use disorders on adverse outcomes: A national prospective study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;201:212-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.03.003
.png)
Todo el contenido de esta revista, está bajo 