Complications and clinical outcomes according to treatment modality for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort in an intensive care unit in Paraguay

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53732/rccsalud/e8941

Keywords:

subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial aneurysm, intensive care units, endovascular procedures, surgical clipping, postoperative complications

Abstract

Introduction. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a neurocritical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. Definitive treatment includes microsurgical clipping (MC) and endovascular therapy (EVT). Objective. To compare clinical characteristics, complications, and in-hospital outcomes of patients with aSAH treated with MC or EVT in an intensive care unit in Paraguay. Materials and Method. This retrospective cohort included 196 adults with aSAH admitted between January 2023 and July 2025; 147 underwent MC and 49 received EVT. Demographic characteristics, baseline severity, neurological and systemic complications, mortality, ICU length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation were analyzed. Results. Relevant baseline differences were observed between groups; patients treated with EVT were younger and had lower neurological severity on some scales. Symptomatic vasospasm was less frequent with EVT than with MC (8.2% vs. 25.2%; p=0.013), as were hydrocephalus (2.0% vs. 15.0%; p=0.018) and in-hospital mortality (4.1% vs. 25.2%; p=0.007). The EVT group also had shorter ICU stays and fewer days of mechanical ventilation. No significant differences were observed in rebleeding, delayed cerebral ischemia, cardiovascular events, or infections. Conclusion. Patients treated with EVT had lower mortality, symptomatic vasospasm, hydrocephalus, and ICU resource utilization. However, baseline differences and clinical treatment selection limit causal attribution of these findings. Analyses adjusted for baseline severity and other prognostic factors are needed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Hoh BL, Ko NU, Amin-Hanjani S, Chou SHY, Cruz-Flores S, Dangayach NS, et al. Guideline for the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2023;54(7):e314-e370. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000436

2. Zhu W, Ling X, Petersen JD, Liu J, Xiao A, Huang J. Clipping versus coiling for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Neurosurg Rev. 2022;45(2):1291-1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01704-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01704-0

3. Neifert SN, Chapman EK, Martini ML, Shuman WH, Schupper AJ, Oermann EK, et al. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: the last decade. Transl Stroke Res. 2021;12(3):428-446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-020-00867-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-020-00867-0

4. Guinto Nishimura GY, Solano Pérez JJ, Nathal E, Gómez Amador JL, Barrientos Iman DM, Luna-Arroyo A, et al. Treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: A comparative study and proposed treatment algorithm. Cir Cir. 2022;90(4):495-503. https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.21000682 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.21000682

5. Jaume A, Gil J, Romero M, Negrotto M, Spagnuolo E. Complicaciones del tratamiento endovascular y quirúrgico en las hemorragias subaracnoideas aneurismáticas en Uruguay. Rev Med Urug. 2023;39(4):e201. https://doi.org/10.29193/RMU.39.4.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29193/RMU.39.4.1

6. Olivares Nunura JL, León-Palacios JL, Alaba García W, Martínez Díaz W. Manejo ultra temprano del aneurisma cerebral roto. Reporte de caso y revisión de la literatura. Rev Neuropsiquiatr. 2023;86(1):62-67. https://doi.org/10.20453/rnp.v86i1.4467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20453/rnp.v86i1.4467

7. Flores-Sánchez JD, Saal G, Zumaeta J, Palacios F, Rodríguez R, Molina C. Comparación del tratamiento quirúrgico y endovascular de aneurismas del segmento comunicante posterior. Surg Neurol Int. 2020;11:S7-S16. https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_255_2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_255_2020

8. Osgood ML. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Review of the pathophysiology and management strategies. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021;21(9):50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-021-01136-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-021-01136-9

9. Busl KM. Healthcare-associated infections in the neurocritical care unit. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019;19(10):76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-019-0987-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-019-0987-y

10. Norberg E, Odenstedt-Herges H, Rydenhag B, Oras J. Impact of acute cardiac complications after subarachnoid hemorrhage on long-term mortality and cardiovascular events. Neurocrit Care. 2018;29(3):404-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-018-0558-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-018-0558-0

11. Heit JJ, Ball RL, Telischak NA, Do HM, Dodd RL, Steinberg GK, et al. Patient outcomes and cerebral infarction after ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(11):2119-2125. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5355

12. Edlow JA, Figaji A, Samuels O. Emergency neurological life support: subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23(Suppl 2):S103-S109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-015-0183-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-015-0183-0

13. Rivero Rodríguez D, Scherle Matamoros C, Fernández Cúe L, Miranda Hernández JL, Pernas Sánchez Y, Pérez Nellar J. Factores asociados a una evolución desfavorable en la hemorragia subaracnoidea aneurismática. Neurología. 2017;32(1):15-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrl.2014.12.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrl.2014.12.006

14. Khosla A, Brinjikji W, Cloft H, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF. Age-related complications following endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(5):953-957. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2881

15. D'Souza S. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2015;27(3):222-240. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000130

16. Ibrahim GM, Morgan BR, Macdonald RL. Patient phenotypes associated with outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a principal component analysis. Stroke. 2014;45(3):670-676. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003078

17. Diringer MN, Bleck TP, Hemphill JC, Menon D, Shutter L, Vespa P, et al. Critical care management of patients following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15(2):211-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-011-9605-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-011-9605-9

18. Goddard AJ, Raju PP, Gholkar A. Does the method of treatment of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms influence the incidence and duration of cerebral vasospasm and clinical outcome? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(6):868-872. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2003.033068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2003.033068

Downloads

Published

2026-09-16

How to Cite

1.
Garay Gómez CD, Acosta Salinas AA. Complications and clinical outcomes according to treatment modality for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort in an intensive care unit in Paraguay. Rev. cient. cienc. salud [Internet]. 2026 Sep. 16 [cited 2026 Sep. 21];8:01-7. Available from: http://upacifico.edu.py:8040/index.php/PublicacionesUP_Salud/article/view/941