Mental health in adult clinical emergency services in Paraguay: comprehensive care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53732/rccsalud/e81067Keywords:
mental health, Hospital Emergency Service, Comprehensive Health Care, Psychiatric Emergency ServicesAbstract
The present letter provides a clinical perspective on the need to integrate mental health into adult clinical emergency services in Paraguay. In these settings, the demand for care cannot be interpreted solely from an organic perspective, as suicidal behavior, psychomotor agitation, and other acute psychiatric symptoms may affect the initial assessment, environmental safety, and continuity of care. Therefore, incorporating mental health into emergency services is not an accessory component but rather a prerequisite for comprehensive, safe, and person-centered care.
Recent Paraguayan evidence documents barriers to timely access to specialized care. At Hospital de Clínicas, 45.2% of patients relied on public transportation to reach the service, and most needed to take two buses; furthermore, longer travel times were associated with higher levels of anxiety (1). Although these data do not come from an emergency department, they highlight local barriers that may affect referral and continuity of care. Complementarily, a recent study of 1,621 patients treated for psychiatric emergencies, 1,458 of whom were adults, identified needs related to staff training, safety, privacy, access to psychiatric care, and improvement of referral processes (2). Taken together, these findings support the need for general clinical emergency services to have the capacity to detect, stabilize, and coordinate care for acute psychiatric symptoms, particularly when access to specialized services is limited.
Downloads
References
1. Torales J, Márquez M, Barrios I. The distance to mental health services and the use of public transportation: a challenge for timely care. Med Clín Soc. 2025;9:e566. https://doi.org/10.52379/mcs.v9.566
2. Degirmenci S, Mercan N. Psychiatric emergencies: epidemiological analysis and healthcare professionals' experiences. BMC Emerg Med. 2025;25:109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01268-y
3. Anderson EL, Nordstrom K, Wilson MP, Peltzer-Jones JM, Zun L, Ng AT, et al. American association for emergency psychiatry task force on medical clearance of adults part i: introduction, review and evidence-based guidelines. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(2):235-242. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.10.32258
4. Betz ME, Boudreaux ED. Managing suicidal patients in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;67(2):276-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.09.001
5. Richmond JS, Berlin JS, Fishkind AB, Holloman GH Jr, Zeller SL, Wilson MP, et al. Verbal de-escalation of the agitated patient: consensus statement of the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Project BETA De-escalation Workgroup. West J Emerg Med. 2012;13(1):17-25. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.9.6864
6. Stanley B, Brown GK, Brenner LA, Galfalvy HC, Currier GW, Knox KL, et al. Comparison of the safety planning intervention with follow-up vs usual care of suicidal patients treated in the emergency department. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(9):894-900. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1776
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rossana Elizabeth Duarte Poletti, Márcia Nayane Da Silva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

















All the contents of this journal are licensed under a